Ray Lee wrote:
Another is a more philosophical hangup -- running a process that polls periodically to improve system performance seems backward.
You mean like the kprefetchd of swap prefetch? ;)
Okay, so that's my problem to get over, not yours.
If it was a problem you could add some event trigger to wake it up. -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Eric St-Laurent <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH]gx-suspmod.c use boot_cpu_data instead of current_cpu_data
- Next by Date: Memory leaking behaviour in 2.6.20.11, reiserfs related?
- Previous by thread: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Next by thread: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Index(es):
 |