Re: [PATCH][resend] sysfs/file.c - use mutex instead of semaphore

>On 7/26/07, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:03:54AM +0000, Dave Young wrote:
> > Use mutex instead of semaphore in sysfs/file.c : sys_buffer.
>
> Thanks, it's in my queue, but I'm at a conference this week, so I'll get
> to it on monday, sorry for the delay.
>
Hi, thank you. I'm not sure why it's ignored, I think maybe it should
be splitted to two patches.

Andrew has added this one to -mm tree. I'm happy to hear from you. I
will send the seperated header cleanup patch again. gmail will convert
 tab to white space, so I have to send another post.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][resend] sysfs/file.c - use mutex instead of semaphore
  - From: WANG Cong <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH][resend] sysfs/file.c - use mutex instead of semaphore
  - From: Dave Young <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][resend] sysfs/file.c - use mutex instead of semaphore
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 13/16] Switch to operating with pid_numbers instead of pids
Next by Date: Re: updatedb
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH][resend] sysfs/file.c - use mutex instead of semaphore
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][resend] sysfs/file.c - use mutex instead of semaphore
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]