Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:53:37 +1000 Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:


Not that I want to say anything about swap prefetch getting merged: my
inbox is already full of enough "helpful suggestions" about that,


give them the kernel interfaces, they can do it themselves ;)

It is a good idea if we can give enough to get started. Then if
they run into something they really need to do in the kernel, we
can take a look.

Page eviction order / prefetch-back-in-order might be tricky to
expose.


so I'll
just be happy to have a look at little things like updatedb.


Yes, that is a little thing.  I mean, even if the kernel's behaviour
during an updatedb run was "perfect" (ie: does what we the designers
curently intend it to do (whatever that is)) then the core problem isn't
solved: short-term workload evicts your working set and you have to
synchronously reestablish it.

Sure, I know and I was never against swap (and/or file) prefetching to
solve this problem. I'm just saying, I'm staying out of that :)

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux