On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 09:58:08AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:19:18 +0200,
> "Kay Sievers" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> Removing the dev->parent->bus check fixes it:
> >
> > Yes, let's remove the check, I will check now if we possibly need to
> > fix more than this or only the block-device patch.
>
> It seems this is the only place we check for dev->parent->bus in the
> current git tree.
>
> Patch below.
Thanks for figuring this out, I'll add this to my tree.
So what is the input layer doing so differently from everyone else here?
Is it correct? (sorry, am at a conference this week, so can't dig into
it as much as I would like to until Friday...)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: sysfs/udev broken in latest git?
- Re: sysfs/udev broken in latest git?
- Re: sysfs/udev broken in latest git?
- Re: sysfs/udev broken in latest git?
- Re: sysfs/udev broken in latest git?
- sysfs/udev broken in 2.6.23-rc1 [input, i2c, ...] (Was: sysfs/udev broken in latest git?)
- Re: sysfs/udev broken in 2.6.23-rc1 [input, i2c, ...] (Was: sysfs/udev broken in latest git?)
- Re: sysfs/udev broken in 2.6.23-rc1 [input, i2c, ...] (Was: sysfs/udev broken in latest git?)
- Re: sysfs/udev broken in 2.6.23-rc1 [input, i2c, ...] (Was: sysfs/udev broken in latest git?)
- Re: sysfs/udev broken in 2.6.23-rc1 [input, i2c, ...] (Was: sysfs/udev broken in latest git?)
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]