Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1

[Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>]

On Wednesday 25 July 2007 14:48, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> ... ACPI now seems to select CPU hotplug. Why? 

ACPI=y SMP=y systems require SUSPEND_SMP=y for system sleep support,
and that requires HOTPLUG_CPU=y.

Note that ACPI=y SMP=n systems do not need it,
and thus will not select HOTPLUG_CPU=y

> That is just *broken*. Sure, if you select STR or hibernation, we need CPU 
> hotplug, but just for picking ACPI? Why?

My assumption is that if somebody selects CONFIG_ACPI,
that 99% of the time, they intend that to include support for
the ACPI hooks for system sleep states.

Conversely, supporting the 1% of people who don't want it
isn't worth messing with the 99% who do, nor is
the burden of yet another config option to maintain and
#ifdefs in the code.

On UP, they'd get ACPI system sleep support 100% of the time
by default, but on SMP this option had become problematic.

We used to have this:

if ACPI
...
config ACPI_SLEEP
        bool "Sleep States"
        depends on X86 && (!SMP || SUSPEND_SMP)
        depends on PM
        default y

So the poster-child failure was i386/defconfig itself...
It couldn't support suspend to RAM because it didn't include
CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP.  Not trivial for a user to select it
when it doesn't even appear on the menu.  It doesn't appear
because CONFIG_SUSPEND_SMP isn't enabled, but that doesn't
appear either -- because CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU isn't selected.

Most users don't want that.

So today we have this:

menuconfig ACPI
	...
        select HOTPLUG_CPU if X86 && SMP
        select SUSPEND_SMP if X86 && SMP

Which I think leads to fewer surprises, and less complicated code.
(even though using select itself is fraught with peril:-)

thanks,
-Len

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/