Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IDE] Platform IDE driver (was: MMIO IDE driver)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:

This is now very similar to pata_platform.c, they both use
same platform data structure and same resources.

To achieve that, byte_lanes_swapping platform data variable
and platform specified iops removed from that driver. It's fine,
since those were never used anyway.

pata_platform and ide_platform are carrying same driver names,
to easily switch between these drivers, without need to touch
platform code.

Why? There's a drivers/ide/arm/ide_arm.c IDe driver that some platforms (not in the mainline) hack to access, e.g., CF cards in true-IDE mode. About a month ago I submitted a patch to arm-linux-kernel switching that

   Wrong list to submit sych stuff, post to linux-ide.

driver to using platform-device. I got a reply, that it's not worth it now that IDE is slowly becoming obsolete, and the pata_platform serves the perpose perfectly well. I found this argument reasonable, I had the same

   Ignore such replies in the future. ;-)

doubt, just wanted to double-check. So, why do we now need a new legacy (a/drivers/ide/legacy/ide_platform.c) driver when a "modern" driver exists?

   Good question (I know the answer but won't tell ;-).

Thanks
Guennadi

MBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux