Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IDE] Platform IDE driver (was: MMIO IDE driver)

[Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>]

Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > +	hwif->hw.io_ports[IDE_DATA_OFFSET] = port;
> > +
> > +	port += (1 << pdata->ioport_shift);
> > +	for (i = IDE_ERROR_OFFSET; i <= IDE_STATUS_OFFSET;
> > +	     i++, port += (1 << pdata->ioport_shift))
>
>
>     Looks like shift doesn't buy as anything, why not just use stride?

It doesn't buy us anything in here, but it's conceivable that someone 
may want to write a driver that uses a shift in the I/O accessor rather 
than an array of port offsets, and it's easier to convert a shift to a 
stride than the other way around (not all architectures have an 
equivalent of the cntlzw innstruction, and shift makes it clear that the 
stride must be power-of-two).  Plus, using shift is consistent with what 
we do on ns16550.

-Scott
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/