Hi!
> >> > block aligned regular file data to bring
> >performance
> >> > parity with ext2/3. This is about 225% of the read
> >> > speed of the existing romfs.
> >
> >Doesn't that make these filesystems much bigger? By, on
> >average, .5k
> >per file? Or, if I'm understanding things correctly,
> >~1k?
>
> Yes, my experience has been that it has been almost
> chillingly close
> to .5k per regular file increase in partition size. I
> know in
> applications in which size is utterly critical this may
> be slightly
> unattractive, but in cases where romfs is chosen for its
> byte
> reproducibility and read-only nature the
> size/performance tradeoff is
> fairly advantageous.
If the fs is read-only.. can we do some tail packing and get _both_
speed and space efficiency?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
