Al Viro <[email protected]> wrote: > Where do you see passing &&<label> to assembly? More interesting question > is whether gcc believes it to be const... Passing labels like that to assembly didn't used to work, which is a pity as we could speed up things like get_user() if it could be made to. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] getting rid of stupid loop in BUG()
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] getting rid of stupid loop in BUG()
- From: Keith Owens <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] getting rid of stupid loop in BUG()
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] getting rid of stupid loop in BUG()
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] getting rid of stupid loop in BUG()
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] getting rid of stupid loop in BUG()
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] getting rid of stupid loop in BUG()
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] getting rid of stupid loop in BUG()
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] getting rid of stupid loop in BUG()
- Prev by Date: Re: commit 7e92b4fc34 - x86, serial: convert legacy COM ports to platform devices - broke my serial console
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IDE] Platform IDE driver (was: MMIO IDE driver)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH][RFC] getting rid of stupid loop in BUG()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][RFC] getting rid of stupid loop in BUG()
- Index(es):