Re: [-mm patch] one e1000 driver should be enough for everyone

Kok, Auke wrote:

I'm working on "e1000e" right now...


Cool :)

I'll submit it with only ich9 id's at first, but it will be able todrive (sysfs bind) to some other devices too. This allows me to keep aneye out on the future structure that I want to give it without removingtoo much code that I might then later have to add back.


Sounds good to me...

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- 2.6.23-rc1-mm1
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [-mm patch] one e1000 driver should be enough for everyone
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] one e1000 driver should be enough for everyone
  - From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] one e1000 driver should be enough for everyone
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] one e1000 driver should be enough for everyone
  - From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] one e1000 driver should be enough for everyone
  - From: "Kok, Auke" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] To vunmap correct address in text_poke()(kprobes)
Next by Date: Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies
Previous by thread: Re: [-mm patch] one e1000 driver should be enough for everyone
Next by thread: Re: [-mm patch] one e1000 driver should be enough for everyone
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]