Re: [Lksctp-developers] __unsafe() usage

Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 09:05 -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>> Please don't remove module_exit point for SCTP.  Simply removing the __unsafe() call will
>> be sufficient.
>>
>> The code has recently been cleaned up to allow safe unloading and I working on final
>> cleanups.  It currently works correctly with forced unloading.
> 
> Thanks Vlad!
> 
> I think that's everyone...

Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • RE: drivers/dma/ioatdma.c - address of '__this_module' will always evaluate as 'true' , warning
    • From: "Nelson, Shannon" <[email protected]>
  • __unsafe() usage
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: __unsafe() usage
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Lksctp-developers] __unsafe() usage
    • From: Vlad Yasevich <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Lksctp-developers] __unsafe() usage
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Fix arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c - 'unknown_nmi_panic_callback' declared 'static' but never defined warning
• Next by Date: Re: i386-show-unhandled-signals-v3
• Previous by thread: Re: [Lksctp-developers] __unsafe() usage
• Next by thread: net/9p/mux.c: use-after-free
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]