Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>> This adds a general mechanism whereby a task can request the
>>> scheduler to notify it whenever it is preempted or scheduled back
>>> in. This allows the task to swap any special-purpose registers like
>>> the fpu or Intel's VT registers.
>>>
>> ok, this looks very clean, i've added it to my scheduler tree. You've
>> tested this with KVM, on both 32-bit and 64-bit, correct?
>>
>
> note: i've done a hook -> notifier rename - 'hook' is way too generic
> sounding and also slightly loaded. (updated patch below)
>
>
Okay, both i386 and x86_64 are happy (with the missing 'next' argument
added, but with the old hook name).
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
