Re: [patch] fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> > apparently the functionality of the soft lockup watchdog was never 
> > actually tested with that patch applied ...
> > 
> > [this is -stable material too.]
> 
> Still isn't working.  I'm getting random meaningless softlockup 
> trippings coming out for no apparent reason.

hm, you still havent applied the other 4 patches i sent:

 softlockup-fix.patch

 softlockup-add-irq-regs-h.patch
 softlockup-better-printout.patch
 softlockup-cleanups.patch
 softlockup-use-cpu-clock.patch

they are all necessary.

softlockup-use-cpu-clock.patch could easily solve the present problem 
you have: as i pointed it out it is _wrong_ to use sched_clock(), 
because sched_clock() is not a reliable clocksource. Especially on your 
VAIO.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux