Re: miserable performance of 2.6.21 under network load

On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 02:49:47PM -0400, Chris Snook wrote:
> Is it always CPU 0, or does it move?  Are you running irqbalance?  If 
> you're running irqbalance, you can run a script that alternates between 
> 'cat /proc/interrupts' and 'mpstat -P ALL 5 10' and watch the offending 
> interrupt jump around between processors.  It's not as informative as 
> oprofile, as Andi suggested, but it's really easy to set up.

	Always cpu0

# cat /proc/interrupts 
           CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3       
  0:        166          0          0          0    XT-PIC-XT        timer
  1:          8          0          0          0    XT-PIC-XT        i8042
  2:          0          0          0          0    XT-PIC-XT        cascade
  3:         11          0          0          0    XT-PIC-XT        serial
  4:        830          0          0          0    XT-PIC-XT        serial
  5:  370787109          0          0          0    XT-PIC-XT        eth0
  6:          3          0          0          0    XT-PIC-XT        floppy
  8:          4          0          0          0    XT-PIC-XT        rtc
  9:          0          0          0          0    XT-PIC-XT        ohci_hcd:usb1, ohci_hcd:usb2
 10:   80937699          0          0          0    XT-PIC-XT        3w-9xxx, 3w-9xxx
 12:          5          0          0          0    XT-PIC-XT        i8042
 14:      50931          0          0          0    XT-PIC-XT        ide0
NMI:    1110304     275156     276732     233082 
LOC:  278410000  278410022  278410013  278410014 
ERR:   55003177
MIS:          0
# mpstat -P ALL 5 1 
Linux 2.6.21.5 (*.com)      07/24/07

11:52:30     CPU   %user   %nice %system %iowait    %irq   %soft   %idle    intr/s
11:52:35     all    0.40    0.00   16.12   13.56    0.25   25.13   44.54    299.80
11:52:35       0    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    1.00   99.00    0.00    299.80
11:52:35       1    0.80    0.00   23.65   23.05    0.00    0.40   52.10      0.00
11:52:35       2    0.40    0.00   21.64   14.23    0.00    0.40   63.53      0.00
11:52:35       3    0.60    0.00   19.44   17.03    0.00    0.60   62.73      0.00

Average:     CPU   %user   %nice %system %iowait    %irq   %soft   %idle    intr/s
Average:     all    0.40    0.00   16.12   13.56    0.25   25.13   44.54    299.80
Average:       0    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    1.00   99.00    0.00    299.80
Average:       1    0.80    0.00   23.65   23.05    0.00    0.40   52.10      0.00
Average:       2    0.40    0.00   21.64   14.23    0.00    0.40   63.53      0.00
Average:       3    0.60    0.00   19.44   17.03    0.00    0.60   62.73      0.00
# 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • miserable performance of 2.6.21 under network load
    • From: Aaron Porter <[email protected]>
  • Re: miserable performance of 2.6.21 under network load
    • From: Chris Snook <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] UDF: fix UID and GID mount option ignorance
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] getting rid of stupid loop in BUG()
• Previous by thread: Re: miserable performance of 2.6.21 under network load
• Next by thread: [PATCH 01/11] mv64x60_wdt: set up platform_device in platform code
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]