Am Montag 23 Juli 2007 schrieb Alan Stern:
> Now here's an idea which might work. Can we require every caller of
> device_add() to hold some existing device's semaphore? Normally it
> would be the semaphore of the new device's parent, but it could be a
> higher ancestor. There even could be a single "root" semaphore for
> drivers registering a top-level device with no parent.
What prevents us from having a device addition semaphore?
Adding device is not critical to performance, is it?
Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
