Ray Lee wrote:
> That said, I'm willing to run my day to day life through both a swap
> prefetch kernel and a normal one. *However*, before I go through all
> the work of instrumenting the damn thing, I'd really like Andrew (or
> Linus) to lay out his acceptance criteria on the feature. Exactly what
> *should* I be paying attention to? I've suggested keeping track of
> process swapin delay total time, and comparing with and without. Is
> that reasonable? Is it incomplete?
Um, isn't it up to you? The questions that need to be answered are:
1. What are you trying to achieve? Presumably you have some intended
or desired effect you're trying to get. What's the intended
audience? Who would be expected to see a benefit? Who suffers?
2. How does the code achieve that end? Is it nasty or nice? Has
everyone who's interested in the affected areas at least looked at
the changes, or ideally given them a good review? Does it need
lots of tunables, or is it set-and-forget?
3. Does it achieve the intended end? Numbers are helpful here.
4. Does it make anything worse? A lot or a little? Rare corner
cases, or a real world usage? Again, numbers make the case most
strongly.
I can't say I've been following this particular feature very closely,
but these are the fundamental questions that need to be dealt with in
merging any significant change. And as Nick says, historically point 4
is very important in VM tuning changes, because "obvious" improvements
have often ended up giving pathologically bad results on unexpected
workloads.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
