On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:27:18 -0700
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:
> Is there a reason why cpu_sibling_map[] is left out in these changes?
Yes this patch is a trial balloon to make sure that I/we do the right
thing when dealing with the other cpu maps. Patchset will hopefully
soon be forthcoming (after I have dealt with the pile of emails/issues
that came in during my vacation). I'd be glad if someone else could do
it???
Hopefully yours,
C
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]