On 7/23/07, Latchesar Ionkov <[email protected]> wrote:
It doesn't really matter (for me) whether it is sysctl or sysfs interface. The sysctl approach seemed easier to implement. If the consensus is to use sysfs, I'll send a patch (for 2.6.24). Sorry for the incorrect implementation, I guess I stole the code from unappropriate place :)
I think this is appropriate for a "fix" submission to the 2.6.23-rc
series. If you don't have the bandwidth right now, I'll look at
reworking it, or at the very least just removing the sysctl interface.
-eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CTL_UNNUMBERED (Re: [PATCH] 9p: Don't use binary sysctl numbers.)
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: CTL_UNNUMBERED (Re: [PATCH] 9p: Don't use binary sysctl numbers.)
- References:
- [PATCH] 9p: Don't use binary sysctl numbers.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- CTL_UNNUMBERED (Re: [PATCH] 9p: Don't use binary sysctl numbers.)
- From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
- Re: CTL_UNNUMBERED (Re: [PATCH] 9p: Don't use binary sysctl numbers.)
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: CTL_UNNUMBERED (Re: [PATCH] 9p: Don't use binary sysctl numbers.)
- From: "Eric Van Hensbergen" <[email protected]>
- Re: CTL_UNNUMBERED (Re: [PATCH] 9p: Don't use binary sysctl numbers.)
- From: "Latchesar Ionkov" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] 9p: Don't use binary sysctl numbers.
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 7/8] i386: bitops: Kill needless usage of __asm__ __volatile__
- Next by Date: [PATCH respin, was PATCH for review] During VM oom condition, kill all threads in process group
- Previous by thread: Re: CTL_UNNUMBERED (Re: [PATCH] 9p: Don't use binary sysctl numbers.)
- Next by thread: Re: CTL_UNNUMBERED (Re: [PATCH] 9p: Don't use binary sysctl numbers.)
- Index(es):
 |