Re: "build-id" changes break sparc64

[Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:49:36PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 06:55:59PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 10:14:35AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > But I would still like to hear from Alan what the benefits are.
> > 
> > See http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2004-10/msg00178.html
> 
> What does _not_ doing intermediates do to memory footprint of ld(1)
> and time spent in there?

x86_64 defconfig

rm vmlinux*; time make vmlinux

Vanilla tree: ~7,7 sec
With single shot ld (Roland's patch): 8,3 secs

So as expected slower. As we link twice the cost is ~0,3 sec 
for a x86_64 defconfig link on my box.

So it should be beneficial to do it and Alan's link did not really
convince me for the kernel usage.
Al - do you have any input there?

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/