Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:42:15AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
man uptime:
uptime - tell how long the system has been running
I claim that the system is not running when it is suspended,
so the suspension time should not be included in uptime.
So, maybe I shouldn't have put corrected in inverted commas,
because this was a real correction and my previous usage was an
unintended side-effect of an error.
Anyway, the current behaviour is known and I guess any attempt to
change it (e.g. to what Bill was expecting) won't be well received.
So is setting it to a random number considered correct behavior? Any of
the first three values I mentioned would make sense, but the value I see
is neither time since resume, time since power-on to do the resume, or
any of the logical uptime values. That was the whole point of the
original post, the uptime reported makes no sense at all.
--
bill davidsen <[email protected]>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
