CONFIG_VIRT_TO_BUS: what about bus_to_virt?

Is it sensible and safe to let a driver which uses bus_to_virt (but not
virt_to_bus) depend on CONFIG_VIRT_TO_BUS?  Thanks,
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=== =-=-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: CONFIG_VIRT_TO_BUS: what about bus_to_virt?
    • From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [kbuild-devel] [PATCH 25/33] kbuild: use POSIX BRE in headers install target
• Next by Date: Re: Patches for REALLY TINY 386 kernels
• Previous by thread: Re: New wake ups from sky2
• Next by thread: Re: CONFIG_VIRT_TO_BUS: what about bus_to_virt?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]