Re: [kbuild-devel] [PATCH 25/33] kbuild: use POSIX BRE in headers install target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/21/07, Oleg Verych <[email protected]> wrote:
* Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:08:54 +0200
>
> From: Mike Frysinger <[email protected]>
>
> The sed expression used at the moment in scripts/Makefile.headersinst
> relies on the (handy) GNU extension where you can escape ERE's in an
> otherwise BRE without using the GNU -r option.  The following patch
> replaces this "\+" usage with a functionally equivalent POSIX BRE compliant
> "\{1,\}".

Matching at least one occurrence, right?

that is the definition of both + and \{1,\}

>  # Eliminate the contents of (and inclusions of) compiler.h

OK, that means annotations and non ANSI 'inline' thing. Lets see.

>  HDRSED  := sed       -e "s/ inline / __inline__ /g" \
[]
> -             -e "s/[[:space:]]__attribute_const__[[:space:]]\+/\ /g" \

* [[:space:]] are more than tab and space isspace(3), is it more
  effective to use [[:blank:]] instead?

if you want to make some micro optimization in the build install step,
sure ... but functionally, the difference is irrelevant considering
sed operates only on individual lines

> +             -e
> "s/[[:space:]]__user[[:space:]]\{1,\}

substitute one or more ' __user '

> / /g" \

with ' ', everywhere (flag 'g'). So, is it really needed that '\{' thing?

no, there is no grouping marker anywhere, so the match always applies
to just the whitespace

> +             -e "s/(__user[[:space:]]\{1,\}/ (/g" \
> +             -e "s/[[:space:]]__force[[:space:]]\{1,\}/ /g" \
> +             -e "s/(__force[[:space:]]\{1,\}/ (/g" \
> +             -e "s/[[:space:]]__iomem[[:space:]]\{1,\}/ /g" \
> +             -e "s/(__iomem[[:space:]]\{1,\}/ (/g" \
> +             -e "s/[[:space:]]__attribute_const__[[:space:]]\{1,\}/\ /g" \
>               -e "s/[[:space:]]__attribute_const__$$//" \

Is it allowed to use identifiers like '__attribute_const__foo' or
__attribute_const__[anything]? If it's not, last line is useless also.

a question that i think is really only relevant if it actually occurs
in the source code

>               -e "/^\#include <linux\/compiler.h>/d"
whitespace is allowed   ^ here and is used for better readability
sometimes.

so post a patch for inclusion ... not that it's been an actual problem
[yet] though
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux