RE: [PATCH 5/7] I/OAT: Add support for MSI and MSI-X

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Roland Dreier [mailto:[email protected]] 
>
>OK, let's try to avoid going off into the weeds here.  In the context
>of the specific patch that this thread started with, is there any
>point in having both "msix-single-vector" and "msi" interrupt support?

Some versions of this hardware support MSI-X and not MSI.  If it can't
get all the MSI-X interrupts, it will try a single interrupt before
fallign all the way down to Legacy interrupts.  Basically, if we can
only get one interrupt, we'd still like to use the MSI-X mechanics if
possible.  If totally out of the question, then we'll use legacy.

sln
--
======================================================================
Mr. Shannon Nelson                 LAN Access Division, Intel Corp.
[email protected]                I don't speak for Intel
(503) 712-7659                    Parents can't afford to be squeamish.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux