RE: [PATCH 4/7] I/OAT: Split PCI startup from DMA handling code

Andrey Panin [mailto:[email protected]] 
>
>Why this driver lacks MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() ? Is it 
>intentionaly omitted ?

Hmmm - good catch.  It has been missing for a long time in the code.
I'll double check with the original developer to see if it was left out
on purpose and probably add it in a later patch.

Thanks,
sln
--
======================================================================
Mr. Shannon Nelson                 LAN Access Division, Intel Corp.
[email protected]                I don't speak for Intel
(503) 712-7659                    Parents can't afford to be squeamish.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 4/7] I/OAT: Split PCI startup from DMA handling code
    • From: Andrey Panin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: drivers/base/core.c broken for non-CONFIG_HOTPLUG
• Next by Date: [PATCH] idr_remove_all: kill unused variable
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/7] I/OAT: Split PCI startup from DMA handling code
• Next by thread: [PATCH 5/7] I/OAT: Add support for MSI and MSI-X
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]