Re: [PATCH] fs/fuse/dev.c: use zero_user_page instead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/20/07, Denis Cheng <[email protected]> wrote:
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[email protected]>
---
I'm not very sure zero_user_page is correctly used here,
so please feel free to give comments.

and why here it uses KM_USER1 not KM_USER0, What are the differences?

 fs/fuse/dev.c |    8 +++-----
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index 3ad22be..e55b5e8 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -533,11 +533,9 @@ static int fuse_copy_do(struct fuse_copy_state *cs, void **val, unsigned *size)
 static int fuse_copy_page(struct fuse_copy_state *cs, struct page *page,
                          unsigned offset, unsigned count, int zeroing)
 {
-       if (page && zeroing && count < PAGE_SIZE) {
-               void *mapaddr = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER1);
-               memset(mapaddr, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
-               kunmap_atomic(mapaddr, KM_USER1);
-       }
+       if (page && zeroing && count < PAGE_SIZE)
+               zero_user_page(page, 0, PAGE_SIZE, KM_USER1);
Why clear all page? IMHO,only count bytes need to be cleared.
+
        while (count) {
                int err;
                if (!cs->len && (err = fuse_copy_fill(cs)))
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux