Re: [PATCH] [15/58] i386: Rewrite sched_clock

> I noticed the same thing about interrupts off when going through the
> code.

That's only on a slow path during cpu frequency changing while the TSC is instable.
Shouldn't be that common.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] [15/58] i386: Rewrite sched_clock
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] [0/58] First batch of x86 patches for .23
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] [15/58] i386: Rewrite sched_clock
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] [15/58] i386: Rewrite sched_clock
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH for review] [12/48] x86_64: use the global PIT lock
• Next by Date: Re: new text patching for review
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [15/58] i386: Rewrite sched_clock (cmpxchg8b)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [15/58] i386: Rewrite sched_clock
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]