Re: [PATCH] [15/58] i386: Rewrite sched_clock

> I noticed the same thing about interrupts off when going through the
> code.

That's only on a slow path during cpu frequency changing while the TSC is instable.
Shouldn't be that common.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] [15/58] i386: Rewrite sched_clock
  - From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] [0/58] First batch of x86 patches for .23
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [15/58] i386: Rewrite sched_clock
  - From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [15/58] i386: Rewrite sched_clock
  - From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH for review] [12/48] x86_64: use the global PIT lock
Next by Date: Re: new text patching for review
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [15/58] i386: Rewrite sched_clock (cmpxchg8b)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [15/58] i386: Rewrite sched_clock
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]