Re: [PATCH] async_tx: fix kmap_atomic usage in async_memcpy

On 7/19/07, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

Neato.

You (or at least, Shannon) run a git tree.  I always get confused when
git-tree-owners send me patches, because I expect them to put the
patches into their git trees.

So if you, a git-tree-owner, wish me to merge-test-and-forward a patch,
please explicitly tell me.
-

Please merge-test-and-forward this one, I will have an 'async_tx' git
topic branch setup for these things shortly.

Thanks,
Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] async_tx: fix kmap_atomic usage in async_memcpy
    • From: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] async_tx: fix kmap_atomic usage in async_memcpy
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [AGPGART] intel_agp: fix ids for 945GME, 965GME
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net/core: merge the content of dev_mcast.c into dev.c
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] async_tx: fix kmap_atomic usage in async_memcpy
• Next by thread: [GIT PULL] mm: Remove slab destructors from kmem_cache_create().
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]