Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390

* Jan Glauber <[email protected]> wrote:

> > still, CFS needs time measurement across idle periods as well, for 
> > another purpose: to be able to do precise task statistics for /proc. 
> > (for top, ps, etc.) So it's still true that sched_clock() should 
> > include idle periods too.
> 
> I'm not sure, s390 already has an implemetation for precise accounting 
> in the architecture code, does CFS also improve accounting data?

what kind of precise accounting does s390 have in the architecture code? 
CFS changes task (and load) accounting to be sched_clock() driven in 
essence.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390
    • From: Jan Glauber <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390
    • From: Jan Glauber <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390
    • From: Jan Glauber <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix a use after free bug in kernel->userspace relay file support
• Next by Date: [patch] slub crashes with recent -git
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]