Fix afs_send_simple_reply() to accept a greater-than-zero return value from
rxrpc_kernel_send_data() as being a successful return rather than thinking it
an error and aborting the call.
rxrpc_kernel_send_data() previously returned zero incorrectly when it worked
successfully, but has been patched to return the number of bytes it
transmitted.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
---
fs/afs/rxrpc.c | 6 ++++--
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
index 1b36f45..3acd08d 100644
--- a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
+++ b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
@@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ void afs_send_simple_reply(struct afs_call *call, const void *buf, size_t len)
{
struct msghdr msg;
struct iovec iov[1];
+ int n;
_enter("");
@@ -806,8 +807,9 @@ void afs_send_simple_reply(struct afs_call *call, const void *buf, size_t len)
msg.msg_flags = 0;
call->state = AFS_CALL_AWAIT_ACK;
- switch (rxrpc_kernel_send_data(call->rxcall, &msg, len)) {
- case 0:
+ n = rxrpc_kernel_send_data(call->rxcall, &msg, len);
+ switch (n) {
+ case 0 ... INT_MAX:
_leave(" [replied]");
return;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
