Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface

* Serge E. Hallyn ([email protected]) wrote:
> Actually, given that when lsm was being introduced, lsm seemed to
> improve performance overall, have you taken any measurements to show
> that this is actually the case?  Of course it makes sense that it would,
> but witjout measurements we do not know.

Yes, it does.  I have measured it as have others (esp. after Kurt
Garloff pointed out issues on ia64).

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
  - From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
  - From: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
  - From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
  - From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup elevator_ops->trim function
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nbd: change a parameter's type to remove a memcpy call
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]