Re: [PATCH] [5/58] x86_64: Report the pending irq if available in smp_affinity

* Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:

> -	int len = cpumask_scnprintf(page, count, irq_desc[(long)data].affinity);
> +	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_desc + (long)data;
> +	cpumask_t *mask = &desc->affinity;
> +	int len;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ
> +	if (desc->status & IRQ_MOVE_PENDING)

small style nit: please put a newline after the type definitions.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] [0/58] First batch of x86 patches for .23
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] [5/58] x86_64: Report the pending irq if available in smp_affinity
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] [33/58] x86_64: Avoid too many remote cpu references due to /proc/stat
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [20/58] x86: Always probe the NMI watchdog
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] [5/58] x86_64: Report the pending irq if available in smp_affinity
• Next by thread: [PATCH] [6/58] x86_64: Use LOCAL_DISTANCE and REMOTE_DISTANCE in x86_64 ACPI code
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]