[PATCH] fs/afs/flock.c: posix_test_lock() returns void

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


posix_test_lock() returns void, so there is no need to test the return value.
Checking fl->fl_type for F_UNLCK instead.

Signed-off-by: Eugene Teo <[email protected]>
 fs/afs/flock.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/afs/flock.c b/fs/afs/flock.c
index 8f07f8d..4f77f3c 100644
--- a/fs/afs/flock.c
+++ b/fs/afs/flock.c
@@ -456,7 +456,8 @@ static int afs_do_getlk(struct file *file, struct file_lock *fl)
 	/* check local lock records first */
 	ret = 0;
-	if (posix_test_lock(file, fl) == 0) {
+	posix_test_lock(file, fl);
+	if (fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK) {
 		/* no local locks; consult the server */
 		ret = afs_vnode_fetch_status(vnode, NULL, key);
 		if (ret < 0)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux