Hi.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:21:00PM +0200, Jens Axboe ([email protected]) wrote:
> > It really looks like the last tree we tested, so if you think additional
> > one will not hurt, feel free to ping, so I will completely rebase
> > testing tree.
>
> It would be great if you could retest! There are some minor changes in
> there, and some extra testing definitely will not hurt.
I've just tested it with 2.6.22
(e1c1e98d2a3f57b22a0d4136c8160e54404aa437 commit) and did not found any
problems - after qute big files were transferred there is no observed
previously skb leak, no crashes (quite a few debug options are turned on
in config) and files are correct on both peers, so it works good.
> --
> Jens Axboe
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
