On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 18:50 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Now, we can talk about making those sysfs core functions generate warnings
> > themselves, and we can talk about generating new wrappers around them which
> > generate warnings and which return void, then migrating code over to use
> > those.
>
> If the only valid reason to fail is a kernel bug, it damn well should be
> that sysfs function itself that should complain. It's the only thing that
> knows and cares.
That's pretty much what Paulus and I have been advocating all along.
There -might- be a couple of cases where something has a good reason to
do a call that may fail and want to test the result code. For those few
rare cases (though none comes to mind at the moment), then I suppose we
could provide some kind of _try version of the function (or whatever you
want to call it) that doesn't warn and just returns an error.
But as I said, I can't see any such case out of the blue.
Cheers,
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
