On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:10:58 +0200
"Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > file: patch-2.4.34.3.bz2 has the corruption at line 213:
> > goto errout
> >
> > That is where that came from, when I patched my 2.4.34 to
> > arrive at 2.4.34.5, before applying the 2.4.35.rc5 patch!
> >
> That sounds wrong. To the best of my knowledge, the 2.4.35-rc5
> patch should be applied on top of 2.4.34, not on top of
> 2.4.34.5 ...
>
> --
> Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
> Don't top-post
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
> Plain text mails only, please
> http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
You are absolutely right! Since I was keeping a 2.4.34.current
and 2.4.35.pre5 is just a pre, I stupidly slapped it on top at
my current build tree!
too much Summer partying!
Thanks a lot!
TonyB
There are 10 types of people in this world, those that read
binary and those who don't!
--
__ __ _ I N C. http://www.sysdev.org
/ __|\\// __|| \ __ __ / [email protected]
\__ \ \/\__ \||)|/ O_)\/ / \/ System Tools / Utilities
|___/ || ___/|_ /\___|\_/ WIntel / Linux Device Drivers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
