Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c

From: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:01:38 +0200

> rae l wrote:
> > All in one word, I don't think the single file dev_mcast.c is needed
> > anymore.
> 
> Agreed. But dev.c is growing larger and larger, maybe dev_addr.c?
> Or dev_config.c, with some of the other device configuration functions?

I don't know, a sizable dev.c is inevitable, allows better refactoring
and consolidation.  And the be honest you're going to have to likely
touch things in dev.c whenever you make changes to dev_addr.c or
whatever you want to name it. :-)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
  - From: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
  - From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
  - From: "rae l" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
  - From: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 03/33] powerpc: Refuse to build 64-bit with GCC-4.2.0 and CONFIG_MODULES
Next by Date: Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 07/18] dm io: fix panic on large request
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]