Re: [PATCH] Use tty_schedule in VT code.

[Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>]

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, James Simmons wrote:
> 
> Because sometimes you do want the delay. In other parts of the tty 
> code we do delay.

Ahh, ok, in that it's ok by me.

> What should be done is 
> 
>         if (tty->low_latency)
>                 flush_to_ldisc(&tty->buf.work.work);
>         else
>                 schedule_delayed_work(&tty->buf.work, 1);
> 
> Is this acceptable to you?

In that case, we might as well just always do the scheduled_delayed_work() 
with a zero timeout as per the earlier patch. I'd still like to know who 
*cares*, though? Why not leave it at 1?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/