> James Simmons, le Tue 17 Jul 2007 19:37:57 +0100, a écrit : > > - schedule_delayed_work(&t->buf.work, 0); > > It was schedule_delayed_work(&t->buf.work, 1); in con_schedule_flip() ; > could that matter? I did not detect any regressions.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Use tty_schedule in VT code.
- From: Paul Fulghum <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Use tty_schedule in VT code.
- References:
- [PATCH] Use tty_schedule in VT code.
- From: James Simmons <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Use tty_schedule in VT code.
- From: Samuel Thibault <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Use tty_schedule in VT code.
- Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PULL][RESEND #2] KVM Updates for 2.6.23-rc1
- Next by Date: Re: Fwd: timerfd read only gets single byte?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Use tty_schedule in VT code.
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Use tty_schedule in VT code.
- Index(es):