Re: Q: a bogus task_running() check in try_to_wake_up() ?

* Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> wrote:

> try_to_wake_up:
> 	
> 	if (p->se.on_rq)
> 		goto out_running;
> 
> 	...
> 
> 	if (unlikely(task_running(rq, p)))
> 		goto out_activate;
> 
> How it possible that rq->curr has on_rq == 0 ?
> 
> AFAICS, this can only happen if this task is rq->idle. But idle 
> threads should not sleep, we have a special "scheduling from the idle 
> thread!" check in schedule().

it's also possible if an arch uses __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW, 
right?

[ btw., we dont have a special "scheduling from the idle thread" check
  in schedule() anymore, it's now in kernel/sched_idletask.c :-) ]

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Q: a bogus task_running() check in try_to_wake_up() ?
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Q: a bogus task_running() check in try_to_wake_up() ?
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fs/9p/v9fs.c: Delete unused p9_debug_level setting
• Next by Date: Re: [GIT PULL][RESEND #2] KVM Updates for 2.6.23-rc1
• Previous by thread: Q: a bogus task_running() check in try_to_wake_up() ?
• Next by thread: Re: Q: a bogus task_running() check in try_to_wake_up() ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]