Re: ck1 patches for 2.6.22 and 2.6.20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: LKML <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: ck1 patches for 2.6.22 and 2.6.20
From: markus reichelt <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:00:48 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Mail-followup-to: LKML <[email protected]>
Organization: still stuck in reorganization mode
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

* "Ni@m" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Does -ck1 patches for 2.6.22 and 2.6.20 make the same job? Or it's
> better to backport -ck1 for 2.6.22 to 2.6.20?

fyi, http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.ck/7850

-- 
left blank, right bald

Attachment: pgpAy6s51sW3z.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- ck1 patches for 2.6.22 and 2.6.20
  - From: "Ni@m" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
Next by Date: Re: maintainer: parport drivers
Previous by thread: ck1 patches for 2.6.22 and 2.6.20
Next by thread: [patch] softlockup watchdog: fix Xen bogosity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux