Re: [PATCH 10/10] Use standard CR8 flags, and fix TPR definition

Rusty Russell wrote:

Intel manual (and KVM definition) say it's TPR is 4 bits wide.  Also fix
CR8_RESEVED_BITS typo.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
diff -r 6ef0b4c0d6f7 include/asm-i386/processor-flags.h
--- a/include/asm-i386/processor-flags.h	Tue Jul 17 18:07:48 2007 +1000
+++ b/include/asm-i386/processor-flags.h	Tue Jul 17 18:12:54 2007 +1000
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
 /*
  * x86-64 Task Priority Register, CR8
  */
-#define X86_CR8_TPR	0x00000007 /* task priority register */
+#define X86_CR8_TPR	0x0000000F /* task priority register */

/*

  * AMD and Transmeta use MSRs for configuration; see <asm/msr-index.h>

X86_CR8_TPR is not used in the kernel. But is this meant to be a mask, or something else?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 10/10] Use standard CR8 flags, and fix TPR definition
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 10/10] Use standard CR8 flags, and fix TPR definition
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Use task_pid() to find leader's pid
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] 4K stacks default, not a debug thing any more...?
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 10/10] Use standard CR8 flags, and fix TPR definition
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 10/10] Use standard CR8 flags, and fix TPR definition
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]