Re: [patch] revert: [NET]: Fix races in net_rx_action vs netpoll

[Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>]

On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 07:46:39AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> > static void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
> > {
> >         struct softnet_data *queue = &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data);
> >         unsigned long start_time = jiffies;
> >         int budget = netdev_budget;
> >         void *have;
> > 
> >         local_irq_disable();
> > 
> >         while (!list_empty(&queue->poll_list)) {
> >                 struct net_device *dev;
> > 
> >                 if (budget <= 0 || jiffies - start_time > 1)
> >                         goto softnet_break;
> > 
> >                 local_irq_enable();
> > 
> >                 dev = list_entry(queue->poll_list.next,
> >                                  struct net_device, poll_list);
> >                 have = netpoll_poll_lock(dev);
> > 
> >                 if (dev->quota <= 0 || dev->poll(dev, &budget)) {
> 
> If after poll_napi dev->quota <= 0 dev->poll is not run and
> __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED bit (plus dev->poll_list) stays uncleared.

Or, more precisely dev->poll_list will be cleared just after this,
and net_rx_action returns with __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED bit set.

Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/