Re: [BUG] AS io-scheduler.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/16/2007 06:31 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:

BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ea86ac54
 printing eip:
c022dfec
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1]
Modules linked in: eeprom i2c_viapro vt8231 i2c_isa skge
CPU:    0
EIP:    0060:[<c022dfec>]    Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00010082   (2.6.22.1 #26)
EIP is at as_can_break_anticipation+0xc/0x190
eax: dfcdaba0   ebx: dfcdaba0   ecx: 0035ff95   edx: cb296844
esi: cb296844   edi: dfcdaba0   ebp: 00000000   esp: ceff6a70
ds: 007b   es: 007b   fs: 0000  gs: 0033  ss: 0068
Process rsync (pid: 1667, ti=ceff6000 task=d59cf5b0 task.ti=ceff6000)
Stack: cb296844 00000001 cb296844 dfcdaba0 00000000 c022efc8 cb296844
00000000 dfcffb9c c0227a76 dfcffb9c 00000000 c016e96e cb296844 00000000 dfcffb9c 00000000 c022af64 00000000 dfcffb9c 00000008 00000000 08ff6b30 c04d1ec0 Call Trace:
 [<c022efc8>] as_add_request+0xa8/0xc0
 [<c0227a76>] elv_insert+0xa6/0x150
 [<c016e96e>] bio_phys_segments+0xe/0x20
 [<c022af64>] __make_request+0x384/0x490
 [<c02add1e>] ide_do_request+0x6ee/0x890
 [<c02294ab>] generic_make_request+0x18b/0x1c0
 [<c022b596>] submit_bio+0xa6/0xb0
 [<c013b7b8>] mempool_alloc+0x28/0xa0
 [<c016bb66>] __find_get_block+0xf6/0x130
 [<c016e0bc>] bio_alloc_bioset+0x8c/0xf0
 [<c016b647>] submit_bh+0xb7/0xe0
 [<c016c1f8>] ll_rw_block+0x78/0x90
 [<c019c85d>] search_by_key+0xdd/0xd20
 [<c016c201>] ll_rw_block+0x81/0x90
 [<c011f190>] irq_exit+0x40/0x60
 [<c01066e4>] do_IRQ+0x94/0xb0
 [<c0104bc3>] common_interrupt+0x23/0x30
 [<c018beca>] reiserfs_read_locked_inode+0x6a/0x490
 [<c018e580>] reiserfs_find_actor+0x0/0x20
 [<c018c33b>] reiserfs_iget+0x4b/0x80
 [<c018e570>] reiserfs_init_locked_inode+0x0/0x10
 [<c0189824>] reiserfs_lookup+0xa4/0xf0
 [<c0157b03>] do_lookup+0xa3/0x140
 [<c0159265>] __link_path_walk+0x615/0xa20
 [<c0168a18>] __mark_inode_dirty+0x28/0x150
 [<c01631c1>] mntput_no_expire+0x11/0x50
 [<c01596b2>] link_path_walk+0x42/0xb0
 [<c0159960>] do_path_lookup+0x130/0x150
 [<c015a190>] __user_walk_fd+0x30/0x50
 [<c0154766>] vfs_lstat_fd+0x16/0x40
 [<c01547df>] sys_lstat64+0xf/0x30
 [<c0103c42>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
 =======================

static int as_can_break_anticipation(struct as_data *ad, struct request *rq)
{
        struct io_context *ioc;
        struct as_io_context *aic;

        ioc = ad->io_context;  <======== ad is bogus
        BUG_ON(!ioc);


Call chain is:

	as_add_request
	as_update_rq:
	        if (ad->antic_status == ANTIC_WAIT_REQ
        	                || ad->antic_status == ANTIC_WAIT_NEXT) {
                	if (as_can_break_anticipation(ad, rq))
                        	as_antic_stop(ad);
        	}


So somehow 'ad' became invalid between the time ad->antic_status was
checked and as_can_break_anticipation() tried to access ad->io_context?

Is this similar to:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/4/50

?

Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux