On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 03:24:14AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > Anwyay, so I'm thinking of adding:
> > >
> > > struct inode;
> > >
> > > int is_not_owner(struct inode *)
> >
> > ^static inline ^inode
> >
> > of course.
>
> > > {
> > > return ((current->fsuid != inode->i_uid) && !capable(CAP_FOWNER));
> > > }
>
> This is pointless. If you do not have definition of struct inode
> already available, you'll get breakage on access to ->i_uid.
Yes, I realized that later :-) That was just a (dumb) sketch typed
into the mailer ... I'll send out the conversion patch after compiling
+ booting, of course.
Thanks,
Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
