Serge E. Hallyn [[email protected]] wrote:
| Quoting [email protected] ([email protected]):
| >
| > Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Define and use task_active_pid_ns() wrapper
| >
| > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[email protected]>
| >
| > With multiple pid namespaces, a process is known by some pid_t in
| > every ancestor pid namespace. Every time the process forks, the
| > child process also gets a pid_t in every ancestor pid namespace.
| >
| > While a process is visible in >=1 pid namespaces, it can see pid_t's
| > in only one pid namespace. We call this pid namespace it's "active
| > pid namespace", and it is always the youngest pid namespace in which
| > the process is known.
| >
| > This patch defines and uses a wrapper to find the active pid namespace
| > of a process. The implementation of the wrapper will be changed in
| > when support for multiple pid namespaces are added.
| >
| > Changelog:
| > 2.6.22-rc4-mm2-pidns1:
| > - [Pavel Emelianov, Alexey Dobriyan] Back out the change to use
| > task_active_pid_ns() in child_reaper() since task->nsproxy
| > can be NULL during task exit (so child_reaper() continues to
| > use init_pid_ns).
| >
| > to implement child_reaper() since init_pid_ns.child_reaper to
| > implement child_reaper() since tsk->nsproxy can be NULL during exit.
| >
| > 2.6.21-rc6-mm1:
| > - Rename task_pid_ns() to task_active_pid_ns() to reflect that a
| > process can have multiple pid namespaces.
| >
| > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[email protected]>
| > Acked-by: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
| >
| > Cc: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
| > Cc: Cedric Le Goater <[email protected]>
| > Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
| > Cc: Serge Hallyn <[email protected]>
| > Cc: Herbert Poetzel <[email protected]>
| > ---
| > fs/exec.c | 2 +-
| > fs/proc/proc_misc.c | 3 ++-
| > include/linux/pid_namespace.h | 7 ++++++-
| > kernel/exit.c | 5 +++--
| > kernel/nsproxy.c | 2 +-
| > kernel/pid.c | 4 ++--
| > 6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
| >
| > Index: lx26-22-rc6-mm1/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
| > ===================================================================
| > --- lx26-22-rc6-mm1.orig/include/linux/pid_namespace.h 2007-07-13 13:07:01.000000000 -0700
| > +++ lx26-22-rc6-mm1/include/linux/pid_namespace.h 2007-07-13 18:22:49.000000000 -0700
| > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ struct pid_namespace {
| > struct pidmap pidmap[PIDMAP_ENTRIES];
| > int last_pid;
| > struct task_struct *child_reaper;
| > - struct kmem_cache_t *pid_cachep;
| > + struct kmem_cache *pid_cachep;
|
| This change is, of course, unrelated to the description.
Yes. It fixes a warning.
I had sent a mail earlier to this list about the warning, but I guess
that mail did not make it due to our mail server being down on Fri/Sat.
|
| > };
| >
| > extern struct pid_namespace init_pid_ns;
| > @@ -39,6 +39,11 @@ static inline void put_pid_ns(struct pid
| > kref_put(&ns->kref, free_pid_ns);
| > }
| >
| > +static inline struct pid_namespace *task_active_pid_ns(struct task_struct *tsk)
| > +{
| > + return tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns;
| > +}
| > +
|
| I trust you've tested this for the NFS oops?
The NFS problem we got was when exit_task_namespaces() and
exit_notify() were swapped in do_exit(). That change was in
a separate patch and Pavel's has a fix for it.
And that patch is not in -mm yet I think.
This patch is a simple short-cut to what the mainline code is
already doing.
|
| Taking the pid_ns out of the nsproxy was the trigger for the original
| bug, right, to which the solutions were to either take it from struct
| pid, or, so long as pid namespaces couldn't yet be unshared, use
| init_pid_ns?
|
| thanks,
| -serge
|
| > static inline struct task_struct *child_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk)
| > {
| > return init_pid_ns.child_reaper;
| > Index: lx26-22-rc6-mm1/fs/exec.c
| > ===================================================================
| > --- lx26-22-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/exec.c 2007-07-13 13:05:38.000000000 -0700
| > +++ lx26-22-rc6-mm1/fs/exec.c 2007-07-13 18:13:39.000000000 -0700
| > @@ -827,7 +827,7 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct
| > * so it is safe to do it under read_lock.
| > */
| > if (unlikely(tsk->group_leader == child_reaper(tsk)))
| > - tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns->child_reaper = tsk;
| > + task_active_pid_ns(tsk)->child_reaper = tsk;
| >
| > zap_other_threads(tsk);
| > read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
| > Index: lx26-22-rc6-mm1/fs/proc/proc_misc.c
| > ===================================================================
| > --- lx26-22-rc6-mm1.orig/fs/proc/proc_misc.c 2007-07-13 13:05:38.000000000 -0700
| > +++ lx26-22-rc6-mm1/fs/proc/proc_misc.c 2007-07-13 13:07:48.000000000 -0700
| > @@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ static int loadavg_read_proc(char *page,
| > LOAD_INT(a), LOAD_FRAC(a),
| > LOAD_INT(b), LOAD_FRAC(b),
| > LOAD_INT(c), LOAD_FRAC(c),
| > - nr_running(), nr_threads, current->nsproxy->pid_ns->last_pid);
| > + nr_running(), nr_threads,
| > + task_active_pid_ns(current)->last_pid);
| > return proc_calc_metrics(page, start, off, count, eof, len);
| > }
| >
| > Index: lx26-22-rc6-mm1/kernel/exit.c
| > ===================================================================
| > --- lx26-22-rc6-mm1.orig/kernel/exit.c 2007-07-13 13:06:52.000000000 -0700
| > +++ lx26-22-rc6-mm1/kernel/exit.c 2007-07-13 18:13:39.000000000 -0700
| > @@ -909,8 +909,9 @@ fastcall NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long co
| > if (unlikely(!tsk->pid))
| > panic("Attempted to kill the idle task!");
| > if (unlikely(tsk == child_reaper(tsk))) {
| > - if (tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns != &init_pid_ns)
| > - tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns->child_reaper = init_pid_ns.child_reaper;
| > + if (task_active_pid_ns(tsk) != &init_pid_ns)
| > + task_active_pid_ns(tsk)->child_reaper =
| > + init_pid_ns.child_reaper;
| > else
| > panic("Attempted to kill init!");
| > }
| > Index: lx26-22-rc6-mm1/kernel/pid.c
| > ===================================================================
| > --- lx26-22-rc6-mm1.orig/kernel/pid.c 2007-07-13 13:07:01.000000000 -0700
| > +++ lx26-22-rc6-mm1/kernel/pid.c 2007-07-13 18:13:38.000000000 -0700
| > @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(void)
| > int nr = -1;
| > struct pid_namespace *ns;
| >
| > - ns = current->nsproxy->pid_ns;
| > + ns = task_active_pid_ns(current);
| > pid = kmem_cache_alloc(ns->pid_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
| > if (!pid)
| > goto out;
| > @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ struct pid *find_ge_pid(int nr)
| > pid = find_pid(nr);
| > if (pid)
| > break;
| > - nr = next_pidmap(current->nsproxy->pid_ns, nr);
| > + nr = next_pidmap(task_active_pid_ns(current), nr);
| > } while (nr > 0);
| >
| > return pid;
| > Index: lx26-22-rc6-mm1/kernel/nsproxy.c
| > ===================================================================
| > --- lx26-22-rc6-mm1.orig/kernel/nsproxy.c 2007-07-13 13:05:38.000000000 -0700
| > +++ lx26-22-rc6-mm1/kernel/nsproxy.c 2007-07-13 13:07:48.000000000 -0700
| > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static struct nsproxy *create_new_namesp
| > goto out_ipc;
| > }
| >
| > - new_nsp->pid_ns = copy_pid_ns(flags, tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns);
| > + new_nsp->pid_ns = copy_pid_ns(flags, task_active_pid_ns(tsk));
| > if (IS_ERR(new_nsp->pid_ns)) {
| > err = PTR_ERR(new_nsp->pid_ns);
| > goto out_pid;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
