From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:37:18 +0200
> I think if you leaned back and thought it through, and if you applied
> this scenario to a bad scheduler commit from me that broke your box,
> you'd readily agree with me =B-) (which scenario is purely hypothetical,
> my scheduler commits are all 100% perfect of course ;-)
Actually I'd probably send you a patch for any bug I found that
triggered on sparc64, since that's faster than asking you to fix a bug
that you are unlikely to be able to trigger on your own systems.
But that's just how I operate.
Ask Thomas Gleixner. Every single hrtimers/nohz bug I've found on
sparc64, I sent him either a full fix or a full analysis of the bug
and a description of exactly what is going on and what needs to be
changed so he can compose the bug fix patch with minimal effort.
I don't ask people to revert, ever. It's never necessary when the
parties involved are extremely competent and responsive.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
