Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > and note that even on the old scheduler, nice-0 was "3200% more 
> > powerful" than nice +19 (with CONFIG_HZ=300),
> 
> How did you get that value? At any HZ the ratio should be around 1:10 
> (+- rounding error).

you are wrong again. I sent you the numbers earlier today already:

|   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
|  2332 mingo     25   0  1580  248  196 R 95.1  0.0   0:11.84 loop
|  2335 mingo     39  19  1576  244  196 R  3.1  0.0   0:00.39 loop

3.1% is 3067% more than 95.1%, and the ratio is 1:30.67. You again deny 
above that this is the case, and there's nothing i can do about your 
denial of facts - that is your own private problem.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/