Re: [PATCH] slob: reduce list scanning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pekka Enberg wrote:
On 7/16/07, Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

Actually SLOB potentially has some fundamental CPU cache hotness
advantages over the other allocators, for the same reasons as
its space advantages.


Because consecutive allocations hit the same cache-hot page regardless
of requested size where as SLUB by definition distributes allocations
to different pages (some of which may not be hot)?

Yeah, that, and also a newly freed slab object is quite likely to be
hot, and that memory can be used by another subsequent allocation --
not always, because the allocation heuristics may not place it there,
but there is potential that is impossible with slab allocators.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux