Re: [PATCH] the wrong variable checked after request_irq()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 23:02 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 07:40:38AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 20:59 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Out of curiosity, how did you pick it up ? You have some automated tool
> > to catch that (or sparse changes) or you just did -lots- of code
> > inspection ?
> 
> While testing sparse changes, actually (comparing pointers to null
> pointer constant spelled without a cast to void *)...  That gave several
> hundred hits, most of them being immediately obvious (picking the lines
> by file and line number and looking through the list had eliminated all
> but about a dozen or two).  Several were not...

Ok. In fact, it would have been nice if gcc had been able to pick it up
for another reason. The old code is:

	if (cascade == NULL)
		return;

	cascade_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(cascade, 0);
	if (cascade == NO_IRQ) {
		printk(KERN_ERR "mpic: failed to map cascade interrupt");
		return;
	}

And NO_IRQ is 0 on powerpc nowadays. Thus the test can never be true :-)

But it looks like gcc doesn't pick that up.

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux