Re: [PATCH -rt 2/5] Thread Migration Preemption - v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 00:48 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 07/14, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> > @@ -288,6 +288,7 @@ struct rq {
> >  
> >  	struct task_struct *migration_thread;
> >  	struct list_head migration_queue;
> > +	struct list_head delayed_migration_queue;
> >  #endif
> 
> I think this could be simplified a bit.
> 
> delayed_migration_queue can be a local variable in migration_thread(), then
> 
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
> > @@ -5623,6 +5624,11 @@ static int migration_thread(void *data)
> >  		head = &rq->migration_queue;
> >  
> >  		if (list_empty(head)) {
> > +			/*
> > +			 * we got a wakeup, give the delayed list another shot.
> > +			 */
> > +			if (current->state != TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
> > +				list_splice(&rq->delayed_migration_queue, head);
> 
> No need to check TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, just do list_splice() unconditionally and
> call schedule().

Yes, I got my head in a twist on that one. You are quite right!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux